The SAFE, by the numbers
01
~90%
Pre-seed rounds raised on a SAFE
Carta · 2024–25
02
$10M
Median post-money cap at pre-seed
Varies widely by sector
03
20%
Most common discount rate
When a discount is used at all
04
There is no expiration date in a SAFE
No maturity · no interest
05
~87%
Of SAFEs are post-money
The modern default
06
Liquidity-event downside floor
Greater of cash back or as-converted
07
2013
When Y Combinator introduced the SAFE
A convertible-note replacement
08
7→33
Pages in the SAFE vs. its user guide
Simple to sign · worth reading
Section 01

What a SAFE actually is, and what it isn’t.

SAFE stands for Simple Agreement for Future Equity. It is a contract under which an investor wires money now in exchange for the right to receive shares later. Y Combinator published it in 2013 to replace the convertible note for the earliest rounds, and it has since become the default: by Carta’s data, close to nine in ten pre-seed rounds use one.

The reason for its popularity is also the reason it is so easy to misjudge. A SAFE is not debt: no interest accrues, there is no maturity date, and nothing ever has to be repaid. It is also not stock: the investor owns no shares, has no vote, and sits on no cap table, at least not yet. It is a third thing: a standing right to equity that lies dormant until a trigger fires.

Because it is neither debt nor equity, a SAFE skips the two hardest things about early fundraising: agreeing a valuation today, and papering a full preferred-stock round. That is the whole pitch: speed and standardization. The table below places the SAFE between the convertible note it was built to replace and the priced round it postpones.

Convertible note vs. SAFE vs. priced equity
DimensionConvertible noteSAFEPriced equity
Sets a valuation today?the hard negotiation Deferred (cap or discount) Deferred (cap only) Yes, priced now
Treated as debt?interest & repayment Yes, interest accrues No No, it’s equity
Maturity date?a deadline to convert/repay 18–24 months typical None (perpetual)
Investor gets sharesconversion At the round, or maturity At the next priced round Immediately
Legal cost & speedto close ~
Standardized form?off-the-shelf ~
Section 02

The four levers that matter.

For all its reputation for complexity, a SAFE has only a handful of moving parts. Two are economic terms inside the document; two are rights usually granted in a short side letter. In the overwhelming majority of rounds, the valuation cap is the only number actually negotiated. Everything else is left at the standard setting.

Lever 1 · economic

Valuation cap

A ceiling on the price at which the SAFE converts. The lower the cap, the more shares the investor gets, and the more the founder gives up. On a post-money SAFE, the implied stake is simply investment ÷ cap.

Lever 2 · economic

Discount

A percentage off the next round’s price, typically 20% when used. Rewards the early investor for going first. Modern SAFEs usually carry a cap or a discount, not both; cap-only is the common case.

Lever 3 · side letter

MFN (Most Favored Nation)

Lets an investor adopt the better terms of any later SAFE the company issues. Fair when you’re raising on a rolling basis, but watch the scope, since a low cap given to a later investor can ripple back.

Lever 4 · side letter

Pro rata

The right to invest again in the priced round to maintain ownership. Standard for larger checks. Founder-priced before it is granted, because it is extra dilution stacked on the round (see Section 06).

Section 03

Pre-money vs post-money: the 2018 reset.

The single most important thing to know about any SAFE is which kind it is. In 2018, YC re-engineered the instrument around a post-money valuation cap. The change sounds technical but it fixed the original’s biggest flaw: under the old pre-money SAFE you could not say, on the day you signed, exactly how much of the company you had sold. Under the post-money SAFE you can, with nothing more than addition and division.

Two SAFEs, side by side
Original SAFE · 2013

Pre-money

Cap basis
Pre-money, measured before the money goes in
Ownership sold
A range of outcomes, knowable only later
Do SAFEs dilute each other?
Yes, every new SAFE dilutes the earlier ones
Option-pool increase
Folded into the math, an unknowable future variable
Who bears the surprise
Founders, at the priced round
Post-money SAFE · 2018

Post-money

Cap basis
Post-money, after all SAFE money is counted in
Ownership sold
A fixed % = investment ÷ cap, locked at signing
Do SAFEs dilute each other?
No, each is computed independently
Option-pool increase
Excluded from the conversion math
Who bears the surprise
No one; the number is transparent up front
Section 04

Ownership you can actually calculate.

Start from how much of the company you want to sell. If you are targeting a $1 million raise for 15% ownership, the cap falls straight out of the arithmetic. Once the cap is set, every investor’s stake is just their check divided by that cap, and several caps simply add up.

Worked calculations · setting and reading the cap
1 · Back out the cap from your target
Post-money cap= target raisetarget ownership
= $1,000,000 ÷ 15%
Cap≈ $6.7M
2 · Read each investor’s stake off the cap
Ownership sold= investmentpost-money cap
$500K → 7.5%  ·  $800K → 12%  ·  $1M → 15%
At $6.7M caplinear
3 · Multiple caps just add up
Total sold= Σ ( investmentᵢ ÷ capᵢ )
$500K ÷ $5.5M = 9%
+ $500K ÷ $8.3M = 6%
Combined15%
4 · The hard ceiling
Founder ownership= 100% − ( raise ÷ cap )
Raise the full $5M at a $5M cap → 100% sold
Founders left0%

Because ownership scales linearly with the amount raised, the trade-off is easy to see: every dollar you take in is a fixed slice of the company at a fixed cap. The chart makes both the symmetry and the cliff at the end concrete.

What you keep vs. what you sell, at a $5M post-money cap
Source: YC Post-Money SAFE User Guide (raise vs. founder ownership at a $5M cap).
Section 05

How a SAFE converts in a priced round.

The implied percentage is a promise; conversion is where it becomes shares. A SAFE converts on an Equity Financing: the company’s first sale of preferred stock. Walk through the mechanics, using the cleanest teaching case: a SAFE that carries both a cap and a discount, so you can see which one wins.

Section 06

The cap table, before and after.

Conversion is easiest to grasp on a full example. Take a company that raised $1M across two SAFEs (Investor A, $200K at a $4M cap; Investor B, $800K at an $8M cap), then closed a $5M Series A led by Investor C for 20%. The cap table below shows the moment before the round, with each SAFE at its implied (as-converted) stake, and the moment after it converts: founders stay in control, the SAFE holders land near their implied stakes, shaved down only by the new option pool.

Fully-diluted ownership · before and after the Series A

Where the company sits once the SAFEs and the round close

$1M on two SAFEs, then a $5M Series A led for 20%
Cap-table participantBefore the roundAfter the round
Founderscommon stock78.6%51.5%
Investor A$200K SAFE · $4M cap5.0%3.3%
Investor B$800K SAFE · $8M cap · pro rata10.0%9.1%
Investor C$4M Series A · lead0%20.0%
Other new investorsremainder of the round0%2.5%
Option pooloutstanding + promised + available6.4%13.6%
Totalfully diluted100%100%
“Before the round” shows each SAFE at its implied (as-converted) stake; Investor C and the other new money join only when the Series A prices. The post-money cap fixed the SAFEs’ pre-round stakes; the new money and the option-pool increase do the diluting from there.

Step back to see the trajectory. Founders begin near total ownership; the SAFEs take the first bite, the priced round and its option pool take the second. The post-money cap doesn’t stop dilution; it just makes each bite predictable.

Founder ownership erodes round by round (fully diluted)
Source: YC Post-Money SAFE User Guide, Appendix II, Example 1 (fully-diluted ownership by stage).
Section 07

One SAFE, five futures.

The same instrument behaves very differently depending on which event arrives first, and at what valuation. Take Investor B’s $800K SAFE at an $8M cap (a 10% implied stake) and follow it into each possible future. This branch is the heart of the SAFE: the investor’s share, in percent or in dollars, depends entirely on what happens to the company.

Investor B’s outcome by event · $800K SAFE @ $8M post-money cap
Hover any outcome to trace its trigger and read the mechanics. The same SAFE pays out very differently depending on which event fires first, and at what valuation.

The liquidity branches deserve their own picture. Because the investor receives the greater of their money back or their as-converted share, the payoff has a flat floor and then a straight climb. The kink is the crossover point: the sale price at which converting beats taking the cash. This is the source of the “1×” figure in the KPIs above: it comes from the SAFE’s own Liquidity Event / Cash-Out provisions, not from anything negotiated.

Investor payout in an acquisition: the “greater of” floor (in $ thousands)
Source: YC User Guide, Appendix II (Change-of-Control payouts). Below ~$8M, Investor B takes the 1× floor; above it, the as-converted share wins.
Section 08

What to accept, what to push back on.

Most SAFE negotiation happens not in the form itself but in the side letter. Sophisticated investors ask for a standard set of rights; the line between “market” and “aggressive” is well established. Founders should grant the first column freely and resist the second; investors should expect the same.

Side-letter terms · market vs. aggressive
Reasonable · grant freely

Market standard

Pro rata rights
Via side letter, for larger checks (standard)
Information rights
Quarterly financials, annual cap table
MFN
For SAFEs in the same fundraising window
Board observer
Non-voting, for $100K+ checks
Major-investor threshold
Defined at $25K–$100K, round-dependent
Aggressive · push back

Off-market for a SAFE

Super pro rata
Right to increase ownership (excessive)
Liquidation preference > 1×
Changes the economics entirely
Anti-dilution (ratchet)
Belongs in a priced round, not a SAFE
Redemption / put rights
Turns the SAFE into quasi-debt
Veto over future financing
Can trap the company

Founders also notice three things the standard form deliberately leaves out. These are not bugs. They are the price of a single, universally-recognized document. Each is fixable in a side letter when a particular deal warrants it.

The courts have now weighed in on what a SAFE actually obliges the parties to do. Three cases are worth knowing. Together they confirm that a SAFE is a real, enforceable contract, but that investors get the protection they bargained for, not more.

SAFE case law
3 cases
2020Del.
Crashfund, LLC v. FaZe Clan, Inc.
Can a company restructure to dodge a SAFE’s conversion? Not in good faith.

The implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing prevents a company from engineering a de facto merger to deprive a SAFE holder of the conversion it bargained for.

Search the docket ↗
2023Del.
Rostami v. Open Props, Inc.
A sophisticated investor’s fraud claim fails where risks were disclosed.

Promotional “puffery” does not support fraudulent inducement, and sophisticated investors are expected to understand disclosed risks; risk disclosures can defeat claims of reasonable reliance.

Search the docket ↗
2023Del.
Seed River, LLC v. AON3D, Inc.
Information rights are enforceable, but the remedy may only be damages.

A company that failed to deliver side-letter financial reports was liable to the investor, but the court denied an injunction because monetary damages were adequate. Negotiate an express right to equitable relief if you need it.

Search the docket ↗
Section 09

Should you use one?

For the earliest rounds, the SAFE is hard to beat: it is fast, cheap, standardized, and, in its post-money form, transparent about exactly what is being sold. Its rough edges are real but mostly the price of that standardization, and each is fixable in a side letter. The honest summary is that the SAFE is an excellent default that you should still take the time to understand. Here is when to reach for it, and when to reach for something else.

Choosing the instrument
Stick with a SAFE when

The default fits

Stage
Pre-seed / seed, valuation genuinely uncertain
Speed
You need to close fast, on a rolling basis
Investors
Multiple small checks; standardization helps
Governance
No board seat or control terms required yet
Reach for something else when

A priced round or note

Round size
$1M+ in one round → consider a priced round
Lead terms
Lead wants a board seat / defined ownership
Stack is messy
Many SAFEs at different caps → clean up with a round
Discipline / tax
Need a maturity date or debt treatment → convertible note
Primary sources
5 documents
2018Y Combinator
Post-Money SAFE: User Guide & the forms
The authoritative source: the standard forms (cap-only, discount-only, MFN), the pro rata side letter, and the worked examples this page is built on.

“The biggest advantage of the post-money safe is that the amount of ownership sold is immediately transparent and calculable for both the founder and the investor.”

Read source ↗
2013Y Combinator
The original (pre-money) SAFE & primer
The instrument the post-money SAFE replaced, and still relevant where pre-money SAFEs remain outstanding.

Under the pre-money SAFE, an investment produced “a distribution of ownership outcomes, rather than a definite ownership outcome.”

Read source ↗
2022Buzko Krasnov
SAFE: Should’ve Asked For an Explanation
The firm’s read of where the standard form’s gaps bite, and how to close them for cross-border and non-US investors.

A seven-page agreement that needs a 31-page user guide to explain it: convenient, but worth understanding before you sign.

Read source ↗
2024–25Carta
State of Pre-Seed: SAFE adoption & caps
The market data behind the KPIs: ~90% SAFE adoption at pre-seed, post-money dominance, median caps and check sizes.

By 2024–25, the overwhelming majority of pre-seed rounds were raised on post-money SAFEs rather than priced equity or convertible notes.

Read source ↗
2020–23Delaware courts
SAFE case law: Crashfund · Rostami · Seed River
The decisions discussed in Section 08, on good faith, disclosed-risk reliance, and information-rights remedies.

Together: a SAFE is an enforceable contract; companies cannot engineer around conversion; investors get the protections they expressly bargained for.

Search the dockets ↗

Disclaimer

This longread is for informational purposes only and is not legal, tax or investment advice. The figures are drawn from Y Combinator’s illustrative examples and public market data; actual outcomes depend on the executed documents, the company’s capitalization and the terms of each financing. The standard YC SAFE is drafted for US Delaware C-corporations; other jurisdictions require modified forms. SAFEs and their conversion can produce more dilution than estimated where a round prices near the cap. For advice on a specific financing, please contact Buzko Krasnov.